RISK REDUCING MASTECTOMY
javiercejasarjona
Created on July 12, 2023
More creations to inspire you
HISTORY OF THE EARTH
Presentation
THE EUKARYOTIC CELL WITH REVIEW
Presentation
WWII JUNE NEWSPAPER
Presentation
PRIVATE TOUR IN SÃO PAULO
Presentation
FACTS IN THE TIME OF COVID-19
Presentation
AUSSTELLUNG STORYTELLING
Presentation
WOLF ACADEMY
Presentation
Transcript
MIR-5 Cirugía General y DigestivaHospital Universitario Reina Sofía, CórdobaRotación Externa. UMA-CHUAC.
Javier Cejas Arjona
Risk-reducing mastectomy in patients with no mutations carriers
Summary
14
12
10
07
05
03
06. Conclutions
05. Guidelines
04. Predictors
03. Risk factor
02. Incidence
01. Key Concept
01. key concept
Key wordsCBC: Contralateral breast cancerCPM: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy
Studies have demonstrate that CPM (Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy) effectively reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer, with a relative risk reduction of approximately 90-96% in women with or without genetic predisposition
¿Prophylactic mastectomy or risk-reducing mastectomy?
Will I have better breast symmetry after CPM?
Can I avoid future screening with CPM?
Will CPM reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer?
Will CPM reduces mortality risk?
Are you able to answer this questions from patients before the surgery?
02. Incidence
Incidence
CPM (Contralateral prophilactic mastectomy)
03. Risk factor
LEVEL I
Anti-endocrine treatment
DCIS
LEVEL II(Nichols, Lacey JCO 2011)
LEVEL II
RISK REDUCTIONTamoxifen 50%Aromatase inhibitor 70%
LEVEL IMetcalfe 2004 JCO; Evans 2013
LEVEL II(Reiner AS JCO-2013)
Bilateral desease (RR 3 .5)
First-degree relative (RR 1.5)
<55
(RR 2)
Lobulillar +FH
ER positive (RR1)ER negative (RR1.3)
ER status
<30 years 0.5-1.3% CBC rate
Age
0.6% annual CBC of DCIS and/or invasive carcinoma
First-degree relative (RR 2.5)
Risk factor CBC and level of evidence
<45
Family History
04. Predictors
Giardello et al: "Careful re-calibration is required before these models could be used in clinical decision-making"
predict-cbc
Manchester
CBCrisk
Calculate an individual’s risk of contralateral breast cancer in different ways using patient and tumor characteristics such as age at first primary breast cancer diagnosis, family history, ER status, breast density, first breast cancer type, and adjuvant treatments
Heterogeinity
Can we predict CBC?
05. Guidelines
Manchester Guidelines (UK)
ASBrS (USA)
NCCN (USA)
Five step process of pre-operative assessment and counseling:1.Reasons and clinical history2.Calculating CBC risk3.Giving the patient time for the desicision4.Multi-disciplinary team discussion5.Patient decision and consent form
Surgeons should make a direct recommendation for or against CPM to each patient
Patient counseling and informed discussion are important
Options of risk reduction should be discussed in a shared decision-making environment
CPM only recommended in high-risk situation, including BRCA 1/2 and strong family history
Patient counseling and informed discussion are important
Options of risk reduction should be discussed in a shared decision-making environment
Gail model used to identify non-mutation carriers at high risk
CPM only recommended in high-risk situation, including BRCA 1/2
40 years oldwhite race. No BRCA mutation,First menstruation at 12 years oldBiopsy atypical hyperplasia in the past with tumorectomy. Not DCISOne son at 31 years oldMother with BC at 50 years
She wants a CPM
What do you do??
Remedios
The Gile model
NCCN Guidelines "If a woman is not a mutation carrier or is ineligible for testing, a risk score is calculated using the Gail model incorporating other risk elements such as family history, atypical hyperplasia, and higher breast density. In women with a 1.7% 5-year risk of first primary breast cancer combined with a life expectancy of 10 years, CPM should be considered"
06. Conclutions
However risk of complication
No or little absolute risk reduction in low risk due to low incidence
Relative risk 90-96% reduced after CPM
90% satisfaction after CPM
NCCN guideline do not recommend screening after CPM
Patient-perceived risk overestimates calculated risk
No survival benefict after CPM compared to breast conserving
Will I have better breast symmetry after CPM?
Can I avoid future screening with CPM?
Will CPM reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer?
Will CPM reduces mortality risk?
The decision to undergo CPM is preference-sensitive. Good decision-making requires the best available evidence about CPM combined with well-considered patient preferences
Patients rationals for CPM
Javier Cejas ArjonaMIR 5 Cirugía General y DigestivaHURS
Thank you very much!