Want to make creations as awesome as this one?
Register now
Report content

More creations to inspire you

DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES NOV DEBATE

Horizontal infographics

STEVE JOBS

Horizontal infographics

FIRE FIGHTER

Horizontal infographics

ONE MINUTE ON THE INTERNET

Horizontal infographics

SITTING BULL

Horizontal infographics

10 SIGNS A CHILD IS BEING BULLIED

Horizontal infographics

BEYONCÉ

Horizontal infographics

Discover more incredible creations here

Transcript

Reciprocal Partnerships

Student Community Involvement

Benefits the Common Good

Academically Relevant Community

Involvement

Explicit

Civic Learning Goals

Reflection Facilitates Learning

Community Engaged learning ESSENTial elements - taxonomy and definition

This Community-Engaged Learning (CEL) Taxonomy identifies an implementation spectrum for a student-centered approach to CEL courses. The Chancellor's Office defines service learning as one type of CEL which must include all six essential elements from the CEL taxonomy. A companion CEL Framework based on this taxonomy will be utilized by CSU faculty and campus Community Engagement offices to identify where in the spectrum of CEL a course falls, and will result in the assigning of one of two attributes: service-learning (CSLI) or curricular community-engaged learning (CEL). Both the CEL Taxonomy and Framework support the CSU's systemwide effort to better gather data of community engaged learning experiences taking place across our 23 institutions. Campus SL/CE Offices and the COCCE will utilize this information to provide on-going support to faculty, students and the CSU’s community partners.


To see pdf version:

Integrated Assessment of Student Learning

This Community-Engaged Learning (CEL) Taxonomy identifies an implementation spectrum for a student-centered approach to CEL courses. The Chancellor's Office defines service learning as one type of CEL which must include all six essential elements from the CEL taxonomy.

Click the for Essential Element's Description and Implementation Spectrum for classifying CEL courses.

Reciprocal partnerships and processes shape the community activities and course design to enhance student understanding of the importance of community learning.

Reciprocal Partnerships

Implementation Spectrum

INSTRUCTOR AND COMMUNITY PARTNER COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY OR THROUGH CAMPUS SL/CE OFFICE

The communication between instructor and community partner includes course overview (e.g., learning outcomes, syllabus) and the value of the partnership to both community and student learning is shared with students.

INSTRUCTOR AND COMMUNITY PARTNER MEET

The instructor and community partner meet virtually or in person to discuss the course (e.g., preparation/orientation of students, learning outcomes, syllabus), and to identify how the community project can enrich student learning and benefit the organization's mission and work within the community. The value of the partnership to both community and student learning is shared with students.

INSTRUCTOR AND COMMUNITY PARTNER COLLABORATE AS CO- EDUCATORS

The instructor and community partner collaborate as co-educators in various aspects of course planning and design (e.g., learning outcomes, readings, preparation/orientation of students, reflection, assessment) and together they identify how the community project can enrich student learning and add to the capacity of the organization in meeting community needs. The value of the partnership to both community and student learning is shared with students.

Student community involvement has a specific benefit to the material, cultural or institutional interests that members of society have in common. This specific benefit to the common good is intentional, planned for, communicated and assessed with community partners in mind. This may include the organizational capacity, student/client growth, social and economic benefits, etc.

Student Community Involvement Benefits the

Common Good

Implementation Spectrum

BENEFIT TO THE COMMON GOOD IS INTENTIONAL, PLANNED FOR AND IMPLIED

Benefit to the common good as an intentional and planned for component of the course is implied but not explicitly stated in course materials (e.g. in syllabus, discussion or materials). Course does not include assessment of benefit to the common good.

BENEFIT TO THE COMMON GOOD IS INTENTIONAL, PLANNED FOR AND EXPLICITLY STATED

Benefit to the common good is intentional, planned for and explcitly stated in course materials, and is identified (i.e. organizational capacity, student/ client growth, social and economic benefits, etc.). Course may include assessment of benefit to the common good

BENEFIT TO THE COMMON GOOD IS COIDENTIFIED, PLANNED FOR, COMMUNICATED AND ASSESSED

Benefit to the common good is explicitly stated in multiple places and achievable
in the context of the course (i.e. organizational capacity, student/client growth, social and economic benefits, etc.). Instructor and community partner have developed tools and systems to collect data and communicate insights
on the results of students' involvement

Student community involvement is relevant to and integrated with the discipline-based academic content and assignments.

Academically Relevant Community Involvement

Implementation Spectrum

COMMUNITY PROJECT SUPPLEMENTS COURSE CONTENT The community project/activity is added as a component of the course but not integrated with academic content or assignments. Purposes of the community project not included within syllabus.

COMMUNITY PROJECT IS A COMPONENT OF COURSE CONTENT Community project utilized as a “text” to provide additional insight into student understanding of academic content and enhance student’s ability to complete assignments. The syllabus describes the relationship of the community project to learning outcomes.

COMMUNITY PROJECT IS INTEGRATED THROUGHOUT THE COURSE AND EXPERIENCE

The instructor integrates the community project and relevant social issue(s) as critical dimensions for student understanding of academic content which significantly enhance student’s ability to complete assignments. The syllabus provides a strong rationale for the relationship of the community project to learning outcomes

Civic learning goals are articulated and develop students’ capacities to understand and address critical social issues.

Explicit Civic Learning Goals

Implementation Spectrum

CIVIC LEARNING GOALS ARE IMPLIED AND FOCUS

PRIMARILY ON COURSE CONTENT
Emphasis in syllabus is primarily on disciplinebased academic content. Civic learning goals
and/or relevant social issues may be addressed
informally and/or indirectly.

CIVIC LEARNING IS EXPLCITLY STATED AND COMPLEMENTS COURSE CONTENT AND ASSISTS STUDENT UNDERSTANDING

Specific civic learning outcomes that complement the discipline-based academic content are explicitly stated (e.g., in syllabus, discussion or materials). The civic learning assists students to understand underlying social issues.

CIVIC LEARNING IS FULLY INTEGRATED IN SYLLABUS, COURSE CONTENT, AND COMMUNITY PROJECT/ACTIVITY

All course components highlight the integration of civic learning goals with discipline-based academic content. Students gain knowledge and skills relevant to addressing underlying systemic issues of inequity and injustice.

Critical reflection activities and assignments integrate classroom and community learning

Reflection Facilitates Learning

Implementation Spectrum

INFORMAL AND UNSTRUCTURED REFLECTION

Students engage in informal and unstructured reflection about the community project, often at the end of the semester.

INFORMAL AND UNSTRUCTURED REFLECTION

Students engage in informal and unstructured reflection about the community project, often at the end of the semester.

CRITICAL REFLECTION IS FULLY INTEGRATED IN COURSE CONTENT, COMMUNITY PROJECT/ACTIVITY, AND IN COLLABORATION WITH COMMUNITY PARTNER

Instructor and community partner(s) collaborate to build student capacity to critically reflect and develop products that explore the relevance of the experience to academic content and provide ongoing feedback to support student learning. Students use critical thinking to analyze social issues, recognize systems of power, and/or
lead to new action.

Student learning assessment addresses both the discipline-based and civic learning goals, and

includes learning from community involvement.

Integrated Assessment of Student Learning

Implementation Spectrum

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT FOCUSES PRIMARILY ON COURSE CONTENT

Student learning assessment is largely based on the discipline-based content; some credit is given for completion of the community involvement component of the course.

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT INCLUDES DISCIPLINE LEARNING, CIVIC LEARNING AND SOME COMMUNITY FEEDBACK

Student learning assessment articulates varying levels of expectations for both the disciplinebased and civic learning aspects of the course. Community partner provides some feedback on individual student performance.

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT INTEGRATES COMMUNITY PROJECT/ACTIVITY WITH MEANINGFUL COMMUNITY FEEDBACK AND COURSE CONTENT
Student learning assessment holistically addresses both discipline-based and civic learning outcomes, and students are expected to demonstrate competency in both aspects of learning in the course. Community partner provides meaningful feedback on relevant aspects of student learning.