VC9
Thảo Ngọc
Created on April 7, 2022
Over 30 million people create interactive content in Genially
Check out what others have designed:
SPRING IN THE FOREST 2
Presentation
HUMAN RIGHTS
Presentation
BLENDED PEDAGOGUE
Presentation
VALENTINE'S DAY PRESENTATION
Presentation
WOLF ACADEMY
Presentation
EXPLLORING SPACE
Presentation
UNCOVERING REALITY
Presentation
Transcript
Student ID: 11134888
Student: Ngoc Thao VuAdvisor: Shahzeb Mohmamed
Date: 07 Apr 2021
uber Series G (2018) funding and investors
Coventry University of London
- UBER in 2018 and Investors
- DCF method in valuating UBER
- EBITA based Method
- Reference
- Thanks
Content
- New Investors : Coatue Management, TPG, Altimeter Capital, Toyota Motor Corporation
- Bankers have indicated that the company could be valued at as much as $120 billion.
- The key value drivers for the company include its total monthly active riders, the number of rides per rider annually, revenue per ride, net revenues and Price/Sales multiple (based on 2019 revenue)
- VALUATION 76 billion
1. UBER in 2018
2.1. UBER 2018-status
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
There are 6 elements to set story for UBER valuation:
- Potential Market
- Market Growth
- Market Share
- Revenue Slice & Operating Costs
- Reinvestment Needs
- Risk (Cost of capital & Survival risk)
2.2. Setting story for UBER
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
- Statutory Tax rate: 40% (US)
- Risk free rate: 2.1%
- The probability of failingin the next 10 years: 5%
Source: Damodaran (2014)
Other inputs:
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
2.3. FCFF of UBER under DCF Method
Source: Damodaran (2014)
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
Source: Damodaran (2014)
2.3. FCFF of UBER under DCF Method
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
Source: Damodaran (2014)
2.3. FCFF of UBER under DCF Method
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
Source: Damodaran (2014)
2.3. FCFF of UBER under DCF Method
2. DCF method in valuating UBER
From 2018 to 2021, its multiple EBITDA is negative figure (capitalIQ), which has no meaning.
- Compare start-up multiple EBITA to assess company versus the industry.Higher EBITDA multiples are expected in high-growth industries and lower multiples in industries with slow growth. - A positive EBITDA bodes well for company since it is a clear indication that the company is profitable at an operating level; it sells its products/services for more than they cost to produce/provide. In contrast, a negative EBITDA means that the company sells their products for less than what they cost to produce
3. EBITDA Based Method
Website:
- https://www.statista.com/statistics/550635/uber-global-net-revenue/
- https://venturebeat.com/2014/12/04/uber-raises-an-additional-1-2-billion-to-fund-asia-expansion/
- https://hbr.org/2014/12/making-sense-of-ubers-40-billion-valuation
- https://craft.co/uber/funding-rounds
- https://techcrunch.com/2014/06/06/uber-1-2b/?j=624378&e=anthonylarbalestier%40gmail.com&l=351_HTML&u=1959368&mid=6256233&jb=198
- https://app.dealroom.co/companies/uber
- https://www.businessinsider.com/ubers-revenue-2014-11?r=US&IR=T
- https://aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com/search?q=uber
4. Reference
Thanks for your attention
Any question?